Legal Opinion
Atlantic Painting & Contracting Inc. v. Nashville Bridge Co.
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1984PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBSON, Justice.
On July 1,1969, Nashville Bridge Company contracted with the Commonwealth of Kentucky for the construction of the superstructure of the 1-24 bridge across the Ohio River between McCracken County, Kentucky and Massac County, Illinois. On September 10, 1969, Nashville Bridge subcontracted with Atlantic Painting & Contracting Inc. and Buckeye Painting & Sheeting Co., Inc., a. Joint Venture, for Atlantic/Buckeye to provide painting services for the superstructure to the bridge.
Both the contract and the subcontract were for a fixed price, based on scheduled completion in the fall…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fite & Warmath Const. Co., Inc. v. Mys Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1977
- Ridge v. RidgeKentucky Supreme Court · 1978
- Tapp v. Tapp's TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- Delta Lines, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local 85District Court, N.D. California · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReederKentucky Supreme Court · 1988
- Wells v. Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Eurocapital Group Ltd. v. Goldman Sachs & Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
- St. Fleur v. WPI Cable Systems/MutronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.