Legal Opinion

St. Fleur v. WPI Cable Systems/Mutron

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 4, 2008PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

WPI Cable Systems/Mutron (WPI) appeals pursuant to G. L. c. 251, § 18 (a) (1), from the denial of its motion to dismiss the discrimination complaint of Olga St. Fleur, a former employee, and to compel arbitration of that complaint, where the subject matter of her complaint was covered expressly by an arbitration agreement. We transferred the case to this court on our own motion. We now vacate the order denying WPI’s motion and remand this case to the Superior Court for a hearing to determine whether the parties entered into an agreement to arbitrate.

Background. In July, 2000, WPI hired St.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bose Corporation v. EjazCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  2. Feeney v. Dell Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. Greene v. General Hospital Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  4. Bekele v. Lyft, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  5. Drakopoulos v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API