Legal Opinion
Alaska Railroad v. Native Village of Eklutna
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 2002No. S-9277Published
1Opinion of the Court
43 P.3d 588 (2002)
ALASKA RAILROAD CORPORATION and Damco Paving Corporation, an Alaska Corporation, Appellants,
v.
NATIVE VILLAGE OF EKLUTNA, Lee Stephan, Anna Lowrey Curtis, and Municipality of Anchorage, Appellees.
No. S-9277.
Supreme Court of Alaska.
February 15, 2002.
Rehearing Denied April 19, 2002.
William S. Cummings, Ashburn & Mason, Anchorage, for Appellant Alaska Railroad Corporation.
Sara E. Heideman, Hedland, Brennan, Heideman & Cooke, Anchorage, for Appellees Native Village of Eklutna, Lee Stephan and Anna Lowrey Curtis.
William A. Greene, Deputy Municipal Attorney, and Mary K. Hughes,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hancock v. TrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blackburn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- North Kenai Peninsula Road Maintenance Service Area v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Alaska Railroad v. Native Village of EklutnaAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.