Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Clark

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1890PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Ingham. (Peck, J.) Covenant. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The plaintiff traded a house and lot in the city of Lansing, heavily mortgaged, for a farm in Wheatffeld township, also largely incumbered, and which mortgage was then in process of foreclosure. The deed of defendants conveying the farm was, in form, a usual warranty deed. The covenant" against incumbrances is full and without limitation against <fall incumbrances whatever;” but, in the covenant to warrant and defend against lawful claims, the mortgage then being foreclosed is mentioned and excepted.

At the time the trade was made, one Bellinger was in possession of the farm under a verbal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lindley v. DakinIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Smith v. LloydMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Vos v. DykemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Haldane v. SweetMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Hansen v. PrinceMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lavey v. GraessleMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. American Cedar & Lumber Co. v. GustinMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Demars v. KoehlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  4. Simons v. Diamond Match Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Fisk v. PowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API