Legal Opinion

Demars v. Koehler

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 14, 1898PublishedCited by 17 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court, see 31 Vroom 314.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Magie, Chief Justice.

The judgment under review affirmed a judgment of the Essex Circuit Court iu an action *204of covenant in which Demars was plaintiff and Koehler was defendant.

The record discloses that the action was brought upon a covenant against encumbrances contained in a conveyance of lands made by Koehler to Demars, and that the breach of the covenant claimed by Demars was based on the existence of an outstanding term in the lands in one Mutschler.

The bills of exception show that upon the trial it was established that, at the time of the execution…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. WarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
  2. Van Wagner v. NostrandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  3. Hubbard v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1835
  4. Rickert v. SynderNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  5. Townsend v. WeldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Scott v. Albemarle Horse Show Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  3. Tuskegee Land & Security Co. v. Birmingham Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Schurger v. MoormanIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Musial v. KudlikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API