Legal Opinion

American Cedar & Lumber Co. v. Gustin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1926No. Docket No. 82PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

In 1908, William H. Sanborn, William T. Hoey and Frederick H. Reibenack were the owners of a considerable tract of land in Alpena and adjoining counties and conducted lumbering operations thereon. The title to the lands was in Sanborn. At the same time the defendant Gustin owned a still larger tract in the' same counties. Under agreement between the parties, Gustin transferred his lands to Sanborn as trustee. The lands were to be lumbered and sold on joint account and the net proceeds divided. Soon after this agreement was entered into, the plaintiff corporation was organized, the three…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tate v. Pensacola, Gulf, Land & Development Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1896
  2. Mayor of Baltimore v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
  3. Edwards v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Hunter v. New York & Saginaw Solar Salt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Vos v. DykemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Meek v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Dassance v. NienhuisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Tibble v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Hudson)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2011
  4. Wild v. WildMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Kastle v. ClemonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API