Legal Opinion

Haldane v. Sweet

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1884PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Kent. (Gage, J.) Foreclosure bill. The Sweets appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley, O. J.

The able and ingenious argument made by ‘the counsel for the principal defendants in the original suit ;and the complainants in the cross-suit, has failed to satisfy us ■that there is any equity in the case set up for his clients.

The original bill is filed to foreclose a mortgage given by defendant Martin L. Sweet on certain premises in Grand Rapids. It was a purchase-money mortgage, and was given May 1, 1874. The purchase price of the premises was •$21,000, of which $2000 was paid at the time, and the mort•gage now in suit given for the remaining $19,000. Possession of the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Simons v. Diamond Match Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Sisk v. CaswellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. Hyman v. BoyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Haldane v. SweetMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API