Legal Opinion

Liberty v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 20, 2005No. 01-2082, A120225; 02-2066; A120226PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

ORS 105.682 provides that, when an owner of land permits any person to use the land for “recreational purposes,” the owner is not liable for personal injury, death, or property damage that arises out of the use of the land for such purposes. At issue in this case is the scope of that statutory immunity.

The owner of land — the state — permitted plaintiffs to use its land for access to an adjacent parcel of privately owned land, where plaintiffs went swimming. On the way back from their recreational activity, while on the state’s land, plaintiffs were injured. They initiated actions for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Little v. WimmerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Brewer v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Bobo v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Liberty v. State, Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Coleman v. Oregon Parks & Recreation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Liberty v. State, Dept. of Transp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Johnson v. GibsonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
  5. Liberty v. State Dept. of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API