Legal Opinion

State v. Beckham

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 5, 2012No. D100380M; A145541PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of one count of fourth-degree assault constituting domestic violence, a Class A misdemeanor. ORS 163.160. On appeal, she challenges a supplemental judgment of restitution entered 104 days after her judgment of conviction.1 Defendant contends that the court erred in imposing restitution because (1) the supplemental judgment was entered after the 90-day period allowed under ORS 137.106(l)(b), and the court did not find good cause for extending that time, and (2) the record lacks evidence to support the amount of restitution imposed. The state concedes that the trial…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. DeCampCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. EdsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. SumerlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. TisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. State v. CraineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. NuttCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API