Legal Opinion

Cox v. CFSI Temporary Employment

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 28, 1997No. CA 96-959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judith Rogers, Judge.

This is an appeal from the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s order affirming and adopting the administrative law judge’s decision. The ALJ found that appellant failed to establish that he had sustained a compensable injury supported by objective findings as required by Ark. Code Ann..§ 11-9-102(5)(D) (Repl. 1996). On appeal, appellant argues that the Commission erred in not considering deficits in range of motion and mobility as “objective findings.” Also, appellant contends, in the alternative, that there is no substantial evidence to support the Commission’s decision.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Pace IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Duke v. Regis HairstylistsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. University of Arkansas Medical Sciences v. HartCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Mays v. Alumnitec, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Meister v. Safety KleenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API