University of Arkansas Medical Sciences v. Hart
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
D. Franklin Arey, III, Judge.
This appeal challenges the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s determination that the appellee, Phyllis Hart, suffered a compensable injury. Appellants argue that the Commission’s finding of a compensable injury is not supported by “objective findings” as required by Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-102(5)(D) (Repl. 1996). They also argue that the Commission’s finding that appellee suffered a compensable injury in the course and scope of her employment is not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm the Commission on both points.
Both issues presented by appellants…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. PetteySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Gansky v. Hi-Tech EngineeringSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Whaley v. Hardee'sCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
- City of Blytheville v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
- Daniel v. Firestone Building ProductsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Estridge v. Waste ManagementSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- High Capacity Products v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
- Emerson Elec. v. GastonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Carman v. Haworth, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Swift-Eckrich, Inc. v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.