Legal Opinion

Carter v. Poole

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 17, 1984No. 8310SC80PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Plaintiffs sole assignment of error is that the trial judge erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff contends that defendant failed to show that there was no genuine issue of material fact for trial. We agree.

Rule 56 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure provides for summary judgment when the moving party can show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The party that moves for summary judgment has the burden of clearly establishing the lack of any triable…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bernick v. JurdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Vassey v. BurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Flippin v. JarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Williams v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Brooks v. FrancisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bramlett v. Overnite TransportCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Charles v. DougalDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1988
  3. Hofecker v. CaspersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API