Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hofecker v. Casperson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 2005No. COA04-419Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTyson, Judge

I concur with the majority’s holding to affirm the trial court’s Order on the issue of contributory negligence. I disagree with the majority’s reversal of the trial court’s Order on the issue of last clear *348chance. Plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence of each element of last clear chance. I respectfully dissent.

I. Last Clear Chance

Summary judgment on the issue of last clear chance is properly granted for the defendant if the plaintiff fails to forecast evidence to show:(1) That the pedestrian negligently placed himself in a position of peril from which he could not escape by the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Wade Ex Rel. Wade v. Jones Sausage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Clodfelter v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Battle v. ChavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Sink v. SumrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API