Legal Opinion

Pearson v. District Court, Eighteenth Judicial District, County of Arapahoe

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 23, 1996No. 96SA64PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

In this original proceeding under C.A.R. 21,1 we issued a rule to show cause to review orders of the respondent District Court of the Eighteenth Judicial District. The trial court ordered the petitioner, Karen K. Pearson, n/k/a Karen K. Sanders (Sanders), and her former husband, Scott R. Pearson (Pearson), to mediate disputes raised in post-dissolution of marriage proceedings. Sanders, the petitioner before us and in the dissolution proceedings below, seeks relief from the respondent trial court’s orders mandating mediation.2 The exercise of our origi*514nal jurisdiction turns on whether section…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. People v. RoybalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. United Blood Services v. QuintanaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. People v. WarnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. Scoggins v. Unigard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Giampapa v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Blood v. Qwest Services Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Huber v. COLORADO MINING ASS'NSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. People v. HydeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API