Legal Opinion
People v. Roybal
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided December 5, 1983No. 83SA103PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOHR, Justice.
The People bring this interlocutory appeal under C.A.R. 4.1 from an order of the Denver District Court suppressing a blood alcohol test from use as evidence in a forthcoming retrial of the defendant, Andrew Roybal, on the charge of vehicular assault, section 18-3-205, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8). We affirm the order.
The facts giving rise to this controversy are fully set forth in our earlier opinion, People v. Roybal, 655 P.2d 410 (Colo.1982). Briefly, the defendant was the driver of an automobile involved in a collision on May 3, 1980. He was absent when the police officers…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Cosfriff Bros. v. MillerWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
- People Ex Rel. Gallagher v. District Court Ex Rel. County of ArapahoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Verzuh v. RouseColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- People v. DunlapSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- People v. CagleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Thurston v. Box Elder CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- Giampapa v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Pearson v. District Court, Eighteenth Judicial District, County of ArapahoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.