Legal Opinion
Sun Rubber Co. v. National Latex Products Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 19, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 31211PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, District Judge.
In this action, the defendants are charged with infringing two patents owned by plaintiff.
The patents in suit are the “Molitor” patent, United States Patent No. 2,629,-134, which relates to a process for molding hollow plastic articles such as dolls, toys, etc. using a “vinyl” type of liquid plastisol and the “Martin & Rekettye” patent, United States Patent No. 2,629,-131, which embodies a design of a machine to carry out the process.
Defendants have moved for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint as to Patent No. 2,629,134 on the ground that it is invalid…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Trico Products Corporation v. Delman Corporation Delman Corporation v. Trico Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Carter Products, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1955
- General Electric Co. v. Hygrade Sylvania CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- Sirocco Engineering Co. v. B. F. Sturtevant Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- W. E. Plechaty Co. v. Heckett Engineering, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Latex Products Company v. Sun Rubber Company, Akron Presform Mold Company v. Sun Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Application of Bo Thuresson Af EkenstamCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1973
- National Latex Products Company v. Sun Rubber Company, Akron Presform Mold Company v. Sun Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960