Legal Opinion

Leatherman v. American Family Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1971No. 202PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the uninsured motorist coverage provision guaranteed payment, as the trial court found, only to the extent all other sources did not yield the recovery, up to $10,000, to which plaintiff was legally entitled, or whether it went further, as plaintiff contends, to guarantee recovery equivalent to that which would have been received if the uninsured motorist had been insured. As the trial court stated, the case is controlled wholly by the provisions of the insurance contract between plaintiff and defendant.

Provisions of policy.

The policy of defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kopp v. Home Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Tischendorf v. Lynn Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Westerman v. RichardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Le Mere v. Le MereWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Lawver v. BolingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Tahtinen v. MSI InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Whirlpool Corp. v. ZiebertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Nicholson v. Home Insurance Companies, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API