Legal Opinion

Tischendorf v. Lynn Mutual Fire Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1926PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

At the time the lease was executed, the plaintiff, under the fire insurance policy from the defendant, had a coverage of $1,000 on the hay. Had he at that time sold the hay then upon the farm or the hay to be raised in the future, the same would then cease to be covered by the policy on account of the change in ownership. It is the established rule that where an owner of a farm executes a lease of the same for a period of years, there being no reservations or limitations in the lease as to the title to the crops, the lessee takes an absolute title, with the result that the owner also parts…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harrison v. FortlageSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Eastern Railroad v. Relief Firf InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Wainer v. Milford Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Savage v. . Howard Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Hitchcock v. . the North Western Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Amidzich v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Limpert v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Paape v. Northern Assurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  4. Leatherman v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Stebane Nash Co. v. Campbellsport Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API