Legal Opinion

Pintro v. Genachowski

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 14, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2013-0231PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge

The plaintiff, an African-American female of Haitian descent, filed this action against Ajit Pai in his official capacity as the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) for allegedly discriminating against her based on her race and national origin, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 to -17 (2012) (“Title VII”). See Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶¶4, 26-31. Currently before the Court is the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Defi’s Mot.”). Upon careful…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pintro v. GenachowskiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  2. Pintro v. RosenworcelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API