Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Acosta

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 26, 2018No. Civil Action No.: 15–1737 (RC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Kenneth Elliott, an African American male and an employee of the U.S. Department of Labor ("DOL"), alleges that DOL discriminated against him on the basis of race and/or sex when it failed to select him for three separate promotions. DOL moves for summary judgment, offering qualification-based explanations for each hiring decision. While DOL is entitled to summary judgment with respect to two of the hiring decisions, the Court finds that DOL…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hylton v. WattDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  2. Johnson v. WilsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  3. Tarquinii v. HarkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  4. Tyes-Williams v. SessionsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
  5. Wong v. HartogensisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API