Legal Opinion

Benson v. General Motors Corp.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided December 23, 1981No. CV 81-M-0416PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

McFADDEN, District Judge.

This cause came before the court upon the twice amended motion of defendant General Motors Corporation (GM) to dismiss, and upon the motion of plaintiffs to amend their complaint. The motions having been set on a regularly scheduled motion docket, oral argument having been heard, and matters outside the pleadings having been presented to and not excluded by the court, the defendant’s motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment.

Plaintiffs, and the class they seek to represent, had been employed by GM at plants in various American cities.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Michael J. Whittle v. Local 641, International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Adkins v. General Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
  3. Benson v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Weller v. G. M. W. (Glendenning Motorways, Inc.)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  5. Whittle v. Local 641, International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API