Legal Opinion

Whittle v. Local 641, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 24, 1995No. 94-5334UnknownCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs Michael J. Whittle and James Calandrillo appeal from the summary judgment granted to the defendants in this action under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185. The district court held that plaintiff-appellants’ hybrid duty of fair representation claim was time-barred. We will reverse.

I

This case involves a seniority dispute brought about when defendant Yellow Freight System, Inc. began to reorganize its New Jersey terminal operations. Appellants were originally hired to work in Yellow’s Carlstadt terminal, where they…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Louis Vadino v. A. Valey EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. City of Philadelphia v. Lead Industries Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Michael J. Whittle v. Local 641, International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Sheffield v. BushDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API