Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 12, 1993No. 241-93PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

A jury convicted appellant of delivery of a controlled substance and assessed punishment at confinement for six years, probated. The conviction was affirmed. Johnson v. State, 846 S.W.2d 373 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th], 1992). Appellant has filed a petition for discretionary review contending, inter alia, that the Court of Appeals erred in not considering all of the evidence in assaying the harm attendant to the introduction of evidence seized as a result of an illegal search. We agree.

The Court of Appeals held that the search was illegal…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Esteves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Baker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  3. Gomez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
  4. Saenz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  5. Drake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API