Johnson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
A jury convicted appellant of delivery of a controlled substance and assessed punishment at confinement for six years, probated. The conviction was affirmed. Johnson v. State, 846 S.W.2d 373 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th], 1992). Appellant has filed a petition for discretionary review contending, inter alia, that the Court of Appeals erred in not considering all of the evidence in assaying the harm attendant to the introduction of evidence seized as a result of an illegal search. We agree.
The Court of Appeals held that the search was illegal…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Esteves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
4Cited by16 opinions
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Baker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Gomez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
- Saenz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
- Drake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.