Esteves v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MEYERS, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of aggravated robbery, enhanced by evidence of two prior convictions, with punishment being assessed by the jury at life in the penitentiary. The conviction was affirmed. Esteves v. State, 845 S.W.2d 291 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st], 1992). At issue are the State’s exercise of peremptory challenges towards three black members of the venire. 1 We will reverse.
It is now well accepted that the Equal Protection Clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the State from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Keeton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Parra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
- Bausley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999
- Murray v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1993
- State v. SkilesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.