Bailey v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MALONEY, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance and, upon a finding of true as to two enhancement allegations, the jury assessed punishment at sixty years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The Court of Appeals reversed. Bailey v. State, 848 S.W.2d 321 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993). We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review to consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in “holding that the appellant was egregiously harmed by a portion of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
3Cited by101 opinions
- Hutch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Skinner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Bargas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Howard v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.