Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Vickers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1978No. 242PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

This is an appeal from appellant’s conviction for violation of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device & Cosmetic Act and for criminal conspiracy. Appellant raises numerous issues; however, for the reasons set forth below, we affirm appellant’s conviction.

The Commonwealth alleged that on June 4, 1976 at 4:40 P.M., appellant sold two cigar boxes containing drugs, including nalorphine, to Joseph Amato, an undercover agent of the Bureau of Drug Control of the Pennsylvania Department of Justice. It was said that this transaction took place in the kitchen of appellant’s apartment in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. TervalonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. GeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ShireySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. LevensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. SlymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. FinneganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API