Legal Opinion
Clark v. National RR Passenger Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 3, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-0347PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendant’s motion in limine in which it seeks to exclude from evidence any reference, direct or indirect, to medical expenses paid on behalf of plaintiff by the defendant, Washington Terminal Company, or defendant’s insurance coverage, Travelers Group Policy No. GA-23000. For the reasons set forth briefly below, defendant’s motion shall be granted.
Section 55 of the Federal Employer’s Liability Act provides:
Any contract, rule, regulation, or device whatsoever, the purpose or intent of which shall be to enable any common carrier to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- William O. Haughton, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Blackships, Inc., Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Edward W. Blake v. Delaware and Hudson Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Lewis M. Wagner v. Reading CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Thomas v. Penn Central CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Nelson v. Penn Central RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Earl K. Phillips and Carrie Phillips v. The Western Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Mead v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1987
- Francis v. NATIONAL RR PASSENGER CORP.(AMTRAK)District Court, D. Maryland · 1987
- Kendig v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1987
- Muzzleman v. National Rail Passenger Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.