Legal Opinion
Mead v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 26, 1987No. Civ. Y-86-717PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.
Richard Mead, injured during the course of his employment with the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”), sued Amtrak under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. Amtrak subsequently impleaded the Holland Company as a third-party defendant. Following a jury trial of Mead’s claim against Amtrak, Amtrak’s third-party claim against Holland was tried to the Court while the jury deliberated.
Before proceeding to the resolution of Amtrak’s claim against Holland, a preliminary issue requires discussion. Prior to trial of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- William O. Haughton, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Blackships, Inc., Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Moses-Ecco Company, Inc. v. Roscoe-Ajax Corporation, Roscoe-Ajax Corporation v. Charles DetwilerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Edward W. Blake v. Delaware and Hudson Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Hall v. Minnesota Transfer Railway CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
- Christine H. Patterson v. Norfolk and Western Railway Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- John Varhol v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, D/B/A AmtrakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- WM Schlosser Co., Inc. v. Maryland Drywall Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. GardnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Cevasco v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Muzzleman v. National Rail Passenger Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.