Legal Opinion
Francis v. NATIONAL RR PASSENGER CORP.(AMTRAK)
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 30, 1987No. Civ. S 86-463PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
SMALKIN, District Judge.
By letter dated April 10, 1987, I granted the defendant’s motion for reconsideration of my Memorandum and Order dated April 8,1987, which denied defendant’s motion in limine. The motion for reconsideration was heard April 16, 1987.
The particular question raised by the motion in limine is the treatment, under the collateral source rule, of paid medical bills incurred for the treatment of an injured railway worker. It is understood by the Court that these bills are paid on the employing railroad’s behalf under Travelers Group Policy No. GA-23000. This group…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brice v. National RR Passenger Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1987
- Clark v. National RR Passenger Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1987
3Cited by8 opinions
- John Varhol v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, D/B/A AmtrakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Perry v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
- Kendig v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1987
- Ford v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1990
- DeBower v. SpencerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.