Legal Opinion
Muzzleman v. National Rail Passenger Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 13, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-355 MMSPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff, Mark Muzzleman, has filed suit pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act [“FELA”], 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq., against the National Rail Passenger Corporation [“Amtrak”] to recover for physical injuries sustained while employed by Amtrak. Presently before the Court are various pretrial issues which the parties have been unable to resolve.
I. ADMISSIBILITY OF MEDICAL BILLS PAID BY AMTRAK OR AMTRAK’S INSURANCE ...
Plaintiff has proffered bills for medical expenses as evidence of damages he has sustained. Amtrak argues the Court should…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Glover v. Bic Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Kenneth Gumbs and Yvonne Gumbs v. International Harvester, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- John Varhol v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, D/B/A AmtrakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Charles A. Ries, III v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, A/K/A Amtrak National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Duphily v. Delaware Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- United States v. SkeddleDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
- Althouse v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- Andino v. Nexius Solutions, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2026
- Linda J. Russell, administrator of the Estate of Milford R. Russell, Jr. v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015