Legal Opinion

Bjorklund v. Continental Casualty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1931No. 22669. Department TwoPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

The wife of insured, as beneficiary, brought this action to reform a policy of accident insurance, and to recover on the insurance contract as reformed. Acceptance of a policy which provided for the payment of four hundred dollars was induced, plaintiff alleged, by the fraudulent misrepresentations of the insurer’s agent that the amount payable under that policy was three thousand dollars. The trial of the cause to the court resulted in a decree reforming the policy so as to provide for the payment of three thousand dollars to the beneficiary. From judgment against the insurance company and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Meadows v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Starr v. Aetna Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. Continental Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Wallin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Buckley v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Carew, Shaw & Bernasconi, Inc. v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. RoseWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hill v. Great Northern Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Headlee v. New York Life InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Hodges v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API