Legal Opinion

Local Realty Co. v. Lindquist Et Ux.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1938No. 6004PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

This action presents the question: Is the owner-mortgagor who is in actual possession of real estate from the time of sale under mortgage foreclosure to expiration of the redemption period, — when he does not redeem, — liable to the mortgagee-purchaser at the sale for the rental value of the premises during the redemption period?

This involves a construction of Section 104-87-37, R. S. U. 1933, which reads as follows:

“The purchaser from the time of sale until a redemption, and a re-demptioner from the time of his redemption until (mother redemption, is entitled to receive from…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Goodenow v. EwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Page v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Harris v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Walker v. McCuskerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. P.I.E. Employees Federal Credit Union v. BassUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Caldwell v. ThiessenIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Mollerup v. Storage Systems InternationalUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Griffiths v. HammonUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Tech-Fluid Services, Inc. v. Gavilan Operating, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API