Legal Opinion

Simson v. Eckstein

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the Twelfth Judicial District. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrocker, J.

This is an action to recover possession of one hundred vara lot No. 210, in the City of San Francisco. Both parties claim title under one Sprague, who, on the twenty-sixth day of November, 1850, mortgaged the lot, with several others, to Ellis, to secure a promissory note for $4,000, with interest at five per cent, per month, and due February 26th, 1851. The mortgagor, by the terms of the mortgage, appointed Ellis his attorney in fact, to sell the property, in case of the non-payment of the note, at public auction, after giving ten days’ public notice of the sale, and as such attorney, to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Palmerton v. HuxfordNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Jackson ex dem. Rogers v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  3. Smith v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Hidden v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Hayden v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1813

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Frink v. RoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Drake v. DuvenickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Patton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Barnard v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Nixon v. TriberIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API