Barnard v. Brown
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw; Kendrick, J. Assumpsit by Arthur Barnard against Addison T. Brown and another to recover the balance due upon a land contract. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.
The plaintiff contracted in writing, May 26, 1890, that, when the defendants should pay him the full sum of $5,400, he would execute and deliver to them a warranty deed, so as to convey to them in fee, unincumbered, the title to the lots described in the contract. Defendants made payments thereon aggregating $3,196.72. The balance of the moneys becoming due, plaintiff tendered a deed to the defendants, and demanded the balance of the contract price, which was re*453fused, whereupon plaintiff brought this action, and on the trial in the court below recovered damages. On the trial the plaintiff…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Leffingwell v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Shriver v. . ShriverNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Elder v. McClaskeyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Tewksbury v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Murray v. . HarwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Howe v. CoatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Tucker v. ThravesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Ogg v. HermanMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- R. E. L. McCaskill Co. v. DekleSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- Bartos v. CzerwinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.