Legal Opinion

Nixon v. Triber

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1979No. 12422PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

Purchasers of real property at an execution sale appeal from a district court order vacating the sale because notice of the sale failed to comply with I.C. § 11-302(3). We hold that the district court erred in setting aside the execution sale because I.C. § 11— 303 provides the exclusive remedy for failure to comply with the notice provisions of I.C. § 11-302. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

The facts in this consolidated appeal are uncontroverted. A judgment for $1,674.65 was entered against respondents Darrell A. and Marjorie J. Triber in the case of Nixon v. Triber…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Doggett v. Electronics Corp. of Am., Combust. Con. Div.Idaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Smith v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  3. State v. MilesIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hayden v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1813
  5. Lawrence Warehouse Co. v. Rudio Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sterling v. BloomIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Leliefeld v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Odenwalt v. ZaringIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. County of Kootenai v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Vannoy v. Uniroyal Tire Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API