Legal Opinion
Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 1, 2001No. 00-1398PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Chief Judge.
Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Roxane Laboratories, Inc. and Boehringer Ingel-heim Corporation (collectively, “Roxane”) appeal the order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granting the motion brought by Purdue Pharma L.P., The Purdue Frederick Company, The P.F. Laboratories, Inc. and The Purdue Pharma Company (collectively, “Purdue”) to preliminarily enjoin Roxane from infringing, actively inducing infringement of, or contributing to the infringement of Purdue’s United States Patents Nos. 5,549,912 (’912 patent) (claim 2), 5,508,042 (’042…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Titan Tire Corp. v. Case New Holland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Dayco Products, Inc. v. Total Containment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Jack Guttman, Inc. v. Kopykake Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.