Legal Opinion
Titan Tire Corp. v. Case New Holland, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 3, 2009No. 2008-1078PublishedCited by 169 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGER, Circuit Judge.
In this design patent case, in which the patentee sought a preliminary injunction, we first clarify the requirements for such an injunction. We then determine, in light of that clarification and the evidence before the trial court, whether that court was correct in denying the sought-for relief. Because we conclude that under the applicable legal standard the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the injunction, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Appellant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (“Goodyear”) owns U.S. Design Patent No. 360,862 (“the '862 patent”), which claims…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by169 opinions
- Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. LG Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- ASTRAZENECA LP v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. v. West-Ward Pharmaceutical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- American Signature, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.