Willis v. Magette

In this appeal from a final decree in a chancery suit, the questions presented are whether the trial court properly determined that a prescriptive easement had been established by the evidence; that the easement had been used during the prescriptive period for agricultural, logging, recreational, and residential purposes; and that the width of the easement was 30 feet.

At trial, abandonment of the easement was an issue. However, at the petition stage of this appeal, we affirmed the trial court’s ruling that the easement had not been abandoned by refusing the assignment of error relating to…