Kuznicki v. Mason
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY Justice CYNTHIA D. KINSER.
In this appeal involving a condominium unit's limited common element, the dispositive issue concerns whether the owners of the condominium unit had standing to institute this suit seeking injunctive relief and damages against two other condominium unit owners for their actions that allegedly decreased the size of the limited common element. We conclude that, under Code §§ 55-79.53(A) and -79.80(B), only a condominium unit owners' association has standing to sue for claims related to common elements and limited common elements.
RELEVANT FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cupp v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Cupp v. BOARD OF SUP'RS OF FAIRFAX COUNTYSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Mozley v. Prestwould Board of DirectorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
- Rotonda Condominium Unit Owners Ass'n v. Rotonda AssociatesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
- Virginia Hot Springs Co. v. LowmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- VIRGINIAN-PILOT MEDIA v. Dow Jones & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
- Deerfield v. City of HamptonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2012
- Johnson v. Town of Wolfeboro Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- Millisor v. Anchor Point Ventures, L.L.C.Hopewell County Circuit Court · 2008
- Brooks v. StallingsAugusta County Circuit Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.