Legal Opinion

Amstutz v. Everett Jones Lumber Corp.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 5, 2004No. Record 040134PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA D. KINSER, Justice.

The dispositive issue in this case is whether there was credible evidence to support the circuit court's finding, under the clear and convincing evidentiary standard, of continuous use of a road sufficient to establish a prescriptive easement for purposes of forestry, timbering, or logging. Finding each claimant's use of the road insufficient to give notice to the servient landowner that an adverse property right was being exercised, we will reverse the judgment of the circuit court granting a prescriptive easement.

I. PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Everett Jones Lumber…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Brown v. HaleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  3. Fred C. Walker Agency, Inc. v. LucasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  4. Shepherd v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  5. Pettus v. KeelingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Arkoma Basin Exploration Co. v. FMF Associates 1990-A, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. United States v. BlackmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  3. Johnson v. DeBusk Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  4. Hafner v. HansenSupreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  5. Arkoma Basin Exploration Co. v. FMF Associates 1990-A, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API