Legal Opinion

Humco, Inc. v. Noble

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 2000No. 2000-SC-0018-MRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERT, Chief Justice.

Pursuant to CR 76.36(7)(a), Humeo, Inc., doing business as Humana Hospital-Lexington (“Humana”), appeals from an order of the Court of Appeals denying its petition for a writ of mandamus. Through the writ, Humeo sought to compel Judge Mary C. Noble of the Fayette Circuit Court to disqualify opposing counsel for allegedly making improper ex parte contacts, in violation of SCR 3.130(4.2), with current and former Humana employees and to suppress written statements obtained as a result of these contacts.

The underlying claim involves allegations of racial discrimination by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miano v. AC & R Advertising, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  2. Shoney's, Inc. v. LewisKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Aiken v. Business and Industry Health Group, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  4. Lovell v. WinchesterKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Bock v. GravesKentucky Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. P.T. Barnum's Nightclub v. DuhamellIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Patriarca v. Center for Living & Working, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. County of Harlan v. Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  4. County of Harlan v. Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  5. P.T. Barnum's Nightclub v. DuhamellIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API