County of Harlan v. Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc.
Kentucky Supreme Court
1DissentGraves, Justice
I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion on several grounds. First, I do not believe the Harlan County Jailer was under any statutory obligation to seek indigency determinations for inmates needing medical care. Second, the remedy sought does not redress the alleged harm, and other statutory safeguards obviate the need for a writ of mandamus in this case. Finally, the remedy granted by the majority is vague and unworkable. As such, I would reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
A
As the majority points out, this case turns on the issue of duty. Specifically, the pivotal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. KadrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Power, David F. v. Massanari, Larry G.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Commonwealth v. AllenKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
- Layne v. NewbergKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.