Legal Opinion

United States v. Acosta

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided March 30, 1979No. NCM 78 1403PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREGORY, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was found guilty of possession and use of marijuana. He assigns the following errors for our consideration:

I

THE REGIMENTAL FIELD OFFICER OF THE DAY WAS DISQUALIFIED, PER SE FROM AUTHORIZING A SEARCH OF APPELLANT’S BARRACKS ROOM.

II

THE SEARCH OF APPELLANT’S ROOM WAS NOT AUTHORIZED BY A NEUTRAL AND DETACHED MAGISTRATE.

Ill

THE SEARCH OF APPELLANT’S ROOM WAS UNLAWFUL, SINCE CAPTAIN STEVENS WAS NOT AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE ORAL SEARCH AUTHORIZATIONS.

IV

THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY THE GOVERNMENT IS INSUFFICIENT AS A MATTER OF LAW TO SUSTAIN A CONVICTION, SINCE…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. AcostaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. CuffeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. JonesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
  5. United States v. CuffeeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API