Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Cuffee

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided December 28, 1979No. CM 438107Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partClause, Judge

I concur with the majority opinion save that portion concerning Charge I and its specification. I find the majority’s view of United States v. Verdi, 5 M.J. 330 (C.M.A.1978), to be overbroad and I would limit that opinion to its specific facts.

The regulation under consideration in Verdi prohibited the wearing of wigs or hairpieces “while on duty or in uniform except for cosmetic reasons to cover natural baldness or physical disfiguration.” It is clearly stated in the Court’s opinion that where exceptions are contained within a criminal statute or regulation, the jury must be instructed that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API