Legal Opinion
Crow v. Wells
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 29, 1930No. 19405PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERR. C.
This is an action originally brought in the district court of Ottawa county by Homer Wells against Ed Crow to recover a real estate commission. Trial was to a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment thereon in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
The first assignment of error is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment. Defendant neither demurred to nor moved for a directed verdict He, therefore, cannot, in this court, attack the sufficiency of the evidence. Smith v. Ferguson, 96 Okla. 150, 221 Pac. 447; Shackelford v. Goodnight, 94 Okla. 297, 222 Pac.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Swift v. McMurraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Newton v. Okmulgee Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Smith v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Beatty v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. SeyboldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Campbell v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Thatcher v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931