Legal Opinion

Newton v. Okmulgee Grocery Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 30, 1923No. 11000PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

•COCHRAN, J.

This action was filed by defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error to recover on open account. The case was submitted to the jury, and a judgment returned for the plaintiff. The only assignment of error presented in the brief of the plaintiffs in error is:

“The verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to the evidence.

No demurrer was filed to plaintiff’s evidence, no request was made for an instructed verdict, and defendants acquiesced in the submission of the issues to the jury. This court has held that under such circumstances, and where the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holland Banking Co. v. DicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Norman v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Constantin Refining Co. v. Thwing Instrument Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cushing Refining & Gasoline Co. v. DeshanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. City of Chickasha v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Producers' & Refiners' Corp. v. CastileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Milburn v. Miners' & Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Markle v. StekollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API