State v. Marshall
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
After examining the record on appeal and after considering the briefs and the arguments of the parties, we have concluded that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted. The issues have been fully considered in the opinion of the Appellate Court; State v. Marshall, 3 Conn. App. 126, 485 A.2d 930 (1985); and it would serve no useful purpose for us to repeat the discussion therein contained.
The appeal is dismissed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. MarshallConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. KellyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- State v. KariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. RozmyslowiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Edwards v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005