Legal Opinion

State v. Rozmyslowicz

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 9, 1999No. AC 17017; AC 17062PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SULLIVAN, J.

The defendants, Rafal Rozmyslowiez and Jakub Klocek, appeal from judgments of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of burglary in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-101 (a) (1) and 53a-8 and larceny in the second degree in violation of *151General Statutes § 53a-123 (a) (2).1 The defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) denied then-motions for judgments of acquittal because there was insufficient evidence to support their convictions of burglary in the first degree and (2) refused to charge the jury on the lesser included offense of using a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. State v. WhistnantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Schulz v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FullerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. State v. BarnettConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  3. State v. BrooksConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. State v. SpillaneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. State v. ReedConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API