Legal Opinion
State v. Marshall
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 8, 1985No. 2984PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The defendant was found guilty by a jury of larceny in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-123 (a) (3). The defendant has appealed from the judgment rendered on the verdict, and claims that the court erred in its charge to the jury concerning alibi and specific intent. The defendant further submits that the court erred in admitting into evidence a police photograph of him without deleting certain data contained thereon.
The jury could reasonably have found the following facts: On June 5,1983, around 4 p.m., the complainant *127was a passenger in the front seat of a motor…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Connecticut v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. DumlaoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- State v. KellyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- State v. ReddickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- State v. SantiagoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- State v. PettersenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.