State v. Kari

In this criminal appeal, the defendant, Nelson Kari, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction of unlawful removal or alteration of records in violation of General Statutes § 53-153.1 The Appellate Court concluded that his conviction should be affirmed. State v. Kari, 26 Conn. App. 286, 600 A.2d 1374 (1991). We granted certification to permit the defendant to appeal solely on the issue of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a reasonable finding that the defendant had acted “corruptly” within the meaning of the statute.2

The opinion of the Appellate Court…